Federal contract award

0014

AEGIS PROGRAM, FLIGHT MISSION TEST (FTM) - 20

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyDepartment of Defense
OfficeMISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY (MDA)
NAICS541712
PSCAC21 — NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES; BASIC RESEARCH
Parent award / vehicleHQ014711D0014
Set-asideNO SET ASIDE USED.
Pricing typeCOST PLUS AWARD FEE
Obligations$2.5M
Current contract value$3.7M
Potential contract value / ceiling$3.7M
Start dateJun 4, 2019
Current end dateFeb 28, 2014
Potential end dateFeb 28, 2014
Latest award activityJun 4, 2019
Source loadedSep 26, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 11 of 11 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Feb 25, 202110$-1.8KMATERIAL
Jun 4, 20199$1.8KAIRBORNE SENSORS (ABS) SUPPORT FOR THE MDA TEST PROGRAM - HIGH ALTITUDE OBSERVATORY (HALO) AIRCRAFT USED TO COLLECT DATA DURING TESTING OF THE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM (BMDS)
Aug 27, 20188$-4.8KAIRBORNE SENSORS (ABS) SUPPORT FOR THE MDA TEST PROGRAM
Dec 18, 20177$-10.3KAIRBORNE SENSORS (ABS) SUPPORT FOR THE MDA TEST PROGRAM
May 18, 20156$0IGF::CT::IGF AWARD FEE PERIOD #3.
Apr 16, 20145$-448.9KDE-OBLIGATE FUNDS FROM CLIN 0005, 0006, 0010 AND 0015 IN THE AMOUNT OF $448,885.00 AND UPDATE G-06 SECTION TO REFLECT CHANGE IN FUNDING.
Jan 15, 20144$0EARNED AWARD FEE PERIOD #2.
Sep 10, 20133$1.8MDEFINITIZATION OF FTM-21 AND FTM-22, ADD INCREMENTAL FUNDING.
Jul 24, 20132$125.0KCEILING AND FUNDING INCREASES. MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES.
Mar 4, 20131$0INCORPORATE PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS AND MAKE MISCELLANEOUS ADMIN CHANGES FOR INTERNAL GOVERNMENT REPORTING PURPOSES.
Jan 18, 20130$1.0MAEGIS PROGRAM, FLIGHT MISSION TEST (FTM) - 20

Research next steps

  1. Confirm the ordering vehicle and your eligibility or a qualified teaming route.
  2. Check the stated set-aside against the solicitation and current certifications.
  3. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.