Federal contract award

0125

TORPEDO SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyDepartment of Defense
OfficeW6QK ACC-APG
NAICS541710
PSCR414 — Systems Engineering Services
Parent award / vehicleDAAB0703DB011
Set-asideNO SET ASIDE USED.
Pricing typeTIME AND MATERIALS
Obligations$2.0M
Current contract value$2.0M
Potential contract value / ceiling$2.0M
Start dateJun 3, 2015
Current end dateAug 12, 2010
Potential end dateAug 12, 2010
Latest award activityJun 3, 2015
Source loadedSep 26, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 14 of 14 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Jun 3, 201513$0THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS TO TRANSFER PURCHASING OFFICE RESPONSIBILITY FROM W15P7T (ACC-APG DIVISION B) TO W56JSR (ACC-APG DIVISION E).
May 3, 201012$19.8KTO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INCREMENTAL FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,800.00 FOR PWS 3.3 TASK D: TORPEDO SYSTEMS TROUBLESHOOTING. DELIVERABLES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE TECH AND PLANNING DOCUMENTS, PROVIDE EXECUTABLE AND SOURCE CODE, PREPARE TEST AND EXPERIMENTATION AGGREGATION AND ANALYSIS REPTS AND PREPARE TECH & PROGRAMMATIC STATUS REPTS IAW CDRLS B001,B002 & B003.
Mar 22, 201011$0CORRECT LOA ON SLIN 0007AY, ACRN AV
Feb 12, 201010$344.6KCR-2259, SRA, TO 012 FUNDING
Nov 23, 20099$109.3KC-2259, TO 0125, SRA FUNDING
Oct 28, 20098$173.2KFUNDING
Sep 21, 20097$148.1KFUNDING
Aug 3, 20096$0EXTEND POP
Jun 10, 20094$99.0KR2 FUNDING
May 25, 20095$79.2KR2 FUNDING FOR TORPEDO SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
Mar 4, 20093$444.5KR2 FUNDING
Aug 26, 20082$2.9KFUNDING
Aug 18, 20081$0TO 0125 MOD 01 ADMIN CORRECTION
Aug 14, 20080$583.7KTORPEDO SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT

Research next steps

  1. Confirm the ordering vehicle and your eligibility or a qualified teaming route.
  2. Check the stated set-aside against the solicitation and current certifications.
  3. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.