Federal contract award

1240LU24F0056

THE INTENT OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO OBTAIN DESIGN SERVICES FOR A NEW BRIDGE ACROSS RED IVES CREEK OF FOREST SERVICE ROAD (FSR) 218, DECOMMISSIONING OF A PORTION OF FSR 320, REMOVAL OF AN EXISTING BRIDGE ACROSS RED IVES CREEK ON FSR 320, AND REALIGNME

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyDepartment of Agriculture
OfficeUSDA-FS, CSA INTERMOUNTAIN 9
NAICS541330 — Engineering Services
PSCC220 — ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Parent award / vehicle12034320D0041
Set-asideNot reported
Pricing typeFIRM FIXED PRICE
Obligations$68.6K
Current contract value$68.6K
Potential contract value / ceiling$68.6K
Start dateJul 24, 2024
Current end dateSep 19, 2025
Potential end dateSep 19, 2025
Latest award activityNov 26, 2024
Source loadedSep 26, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 3 of 3 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Nov 26, 2024P00002$0THE INTENT OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO OBTAIN DESIGN SERVICES FOR A NEW BRIDGE ACROSS RED IVES CREEK OF FOREST SERVICE ROAD (FSR) 218, DECOMMISSIONING OF A PORTION OF FSR 320, REMOVAL OF AN EXISTING BRIDGE ACROSS RED IVES CREEK ON FSR 320, AND REALIGNME
Sep 16, 2024P00001$9.7KTHE INTENT OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO OBTAIN DESIGN SERVICES FOR A NEW BRIDGE ACROSS RED IVES CREEK OF FOREST SERVICE ROAD (FSR) 218, DECOMMISSIONING OF A PORTION OF FSR 320, REMOVAL OF AN EXISTING BRIDGE ACROSS RED IVES CREEK ON FSR 320, AND REALIGNME
Jul 24, 20240$58.9KTHE INTENT OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO OBTAIN DESIGN SERVICES FOR A NEW BRIDGE ACROSS RED IVES CREEK OF FOREST SERVICE ROAD (FSR) 218, DECOMMISSIONING OF A PORTION OF FSR 320, REMOVAL OF AN EXISTING BRIDGE ACROSS RED IVES CREEK ON FSR 320, AND REALIGNME

Research next steps

  1. Confirm the ordering vehicle and your eligibility or a qualified teaming route.
  2. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.