Federal contract award

19AQMM19F2232

PROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES (GUIDE) WITH, (A) INTEGRATION OF QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS, (B) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZATION FOR ANALYTIC TOOLS, (C) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZE REPORT FORMATS OF PROJECT DURATION PROJECTIONS

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyDepartment of State
OfficeACQUISITIONS - AQM MOMENTUM
NAICS541330 — Engineering Services
PSCC211 — Architect - Engineer Services (including landscaping, interior layout, and designing)
Parent award / vehicle19AQMM19D0028
Set-asideNot reported
Pricing typeFIRM FIXED PRICE
Obligations$574.4K
Current contract value$574.4K
Potential contract value / ceiling$574.4K
Start dateJul 8, 2019
Current end dateJan 25, 2027
Potential end dateJan 25, 2027
Latest award activityAug 18, 2026
Source loadedSep 26, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 9 of 9 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Aug 18, 2026P00008$0PROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES (GUIDE) WITH, (A) INTEGRATION OF QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS, (B) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZATION FOR ANALYTIC TOOLS, (C) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZE REPORT FORMATS OF PROJECT DURATION PROJECTIONS
Mar 27, 2025P00007$0PROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES (GUIDE) WITH, (A) INTEGRATION OF QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS, (B) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZATION FOR ANALYTIC TOOLS, (C) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZE REPORT FORMATS OF PROJECT DURATION PROJECTIONS
Feb 25, 2025P00006$0PROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES (GUIDE) WITH, (A) INTEGRATION OF QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS, (B) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZATION FOR ANALYTIC TOOLS, (C) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZE REPORT FORMATS OF PROJECT DURATION PROJECTIONS
Sep 22, 2023P00005$166.1KPROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES (GUIDE) WITH, (A) INTEGRATION OF QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS, (B) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZATION FOR ANALYTIC TOOLS, (C) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZE REPORT FORMATS OF PROJECT DURATION PROJECTIONS
Mar 29, 2021P00004$73.2KPROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES (GUIDE).
Sep 30, 2020P00003$16.5KPROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES (GUIDE) WITH, (A) INTEGRATION OF QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS.
May 12, 2020P00002$0PROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES. - ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION THAT ADDS UPDATED INVOICE INSTRUCTIONS.
Nov 8, 2019P00001$77.6KPROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES.
Jul 8, 20190$241.0KPROJECT EXECUTION PHASE SCHEDULE REVIEW BEST PRACTICES (GUIDE) WITH, (A) INTEGRATION OF QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS, (B) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZATION FOR ANALYTIC TOOLS, (C) IMPROVEMENT AND STANDARDIZE REPORT FORMATS OF PROJECT DURATION PROJECTIONS

Estimated positioning window

Oct 25, 2026 – Jan 23, 2027

Recompete signal:
75/100

Why this recompete signal

Contract timing and recorded acquisition signals at the time of calculation.

Stored score: 75/100. Available recorded signals: 70 points.

Contract end 2027-01-25 (92 days from calculation)
+35 points
116 historical awards in this buyer and category group
+15 points
9 recorded award transactions
+10 points
Latest award action: 2026-08-18
+5 points
Parent award identifier recorded
+5 points
Solicitation identifier recorded
+0 points
Linked official forecast
+0 points
Calculated on
2026-10-25 10:18:04.631876+00:00

The historical group combines buyer, NAICS, and PSC. Multiple awards in this group do not by themselves establish repeated competitions.

Rule-based research score; it does not measure your chance of winning.

This older calculation does not retain a complete reproducible breakdown. Missing or changed inputs are not assigned invented points: Original award-value bonus input.

USAspending award record

. Rule-based research score; positioning dates are estimates.

Recompete score calculated Oct 25, 2026.

Research next steps

  1. Check the linked forecast or SAM for a confirmed solicitation and current timing.
  2. Confirm the ordering vehicle and your eligibility or a qualified teaming route.
  3. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.