Federal contract award

31310022F0013

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR REGULATORY GUIDE (RG) 1.92 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS METHODS - TASK ORDER UNDER CONTRACT NO. 31310018D0002

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyNuclear Regulatory Commission
OfficeNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NAICS562211 — Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal
PSCR425 — Engineering and Technical Services
Parent award / vehicle31310018D0002
Set-asideNot reported
Pricing typeCOST PLUS FIXED FEE
Obligations$104.0K
Current contract value$104.0K
Potential contract value / ceiling$104.0K
Start dateFeb 1, 2022
Current end dateMar 29, 2023
Potential end dateMar 29, 2023
Latest award activityFeb 9, 2026
Source loadedSep 19, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 6 of 6 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Feb 9, 2026P00005$-14.8KTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR REGULATORY GUIDE (RG) 1.92 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS METHODS - TASK ORDER UNDER CONTRACT NO. 31310018D0002
Mar 20, 2023P00004$0TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR REGULATORY GUIDE (RG) 1.92 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS METHODS - TASK ORDER UNDER CONTRACT NO. 31310018D0002
May 26, 2022P00003$68.8KTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR REGULATORY GUIDE (RG) 1.92 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS METHODS - TASK ORDER UNDER CONTRACT NO. 31310018D0002
Apr 20, 2022P00002$20.0KTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR REGULATORY GUIDE (RG) 1.92 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS METHODS - TASK ORDER UNDER CONTRACT NO. 31310018D0002
Feb 10, 2022P00001$0TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR REGULATORY GUIDE (RG) 1.92 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS METHODS - TASK ORDER UNDER CONTRACT NO. 31310018D0002
Feb 1, 20220$30.0KTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR REGULATORY GUIDE (RG) 1.92 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS METHODS - TASK ORDER UNDER CONTRACT NO. 31310018D0002

Research next steps

  1. Confirm the ordering vehicle and your eligibility or a qualified teaming route.
  2. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.