Federal contract award

75F40118F01007

IGF::OT::IGF SAFTEY REPORTING PORTAL (SRP) ENHANCEMENT - MODIFY THE EXISTING SRP SYSTEM TO MEET THE BUSINESS NEEDS OF CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS EVALUATION AND RESEARCH (CBER) BY LEVERAGING THE SRP SYSTEM TO IMPLEMENT A NEW RATIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE (RQ). THE RQ WILL PROVIDE A MEANS TO ALLOW THE REPORTING OF MANDATORY CBER BLOOD ADVERSE EVENT (AE) REPORTING IN A UNIFIED AND CONSISTING MANNER FOR BLOOD DONATION REPORTS AND BLOOD TRANSFUSION REPORTS. THE RQ IS TO CONSIST OF ABOUT 100 DATA ELEMENTS (QUESTIONS) COVERING BOTH REPORT TYPES BLOOD DONATION REPORTS AND BLOOD TRANSFUSION REPORTS. THE RQ DATA ELEMENTS MUST BE MAPPED TO THE E2BR2 SCHEMA.

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyDepartment of Health and Human Services
OfficeFDA OFFICE OF ACQ GRANT SVCS
NAICS541511 — Custom Computer Programming Services
PSCD399 — Other ADP and Telecommunications Services (includes data storage on tapes, compact disks, etc.)
Parent award / vehicleHHSF223201610048I
Set-asideNot reported
Pricing typeFIRM FIXED PRICE
Obligations$553.5K
Current contract value$553.5K
Potential contract value / ceiling$553.5K
Start dateSep 7, 2018
Current end dateMar 31, 2020
Potential end dateJan 25, 2025
Latest award activityJan 24, 2025
Source loadedAug 15, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 1 of 1 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Jan 24, 2025P00004$-20SAFTEY REPORTING PORTAL (SRP) ENHANCEMENT - MODIFY THE EXISTING SRP SYSTEM TO MEET THE BUSINESS NEEDS OF CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS EVALUATION AND RESEARCH (CBER) BY LEVERAGING THE SRP SYSTEM TO IMPLEMENT A NEW RATIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE (RQ). THE RQ WILL PRO

Research next steps

  1. Verify whether remaining options may extend performance beyond the current end date.
  2. Confirm the ordering vehicle and your eligibility or a qualified teaming route.
  3. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.