Federal contract award

80ARC024F0024

CORE TECHNICAL SERVICES TASK ORDER UNDER NASA ADVANCED COMPUTING SERVICES (NACS) CONTRACT

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
OfficeNASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER
NAICS541513 — Computer Facilities Management Services
PSCDB01 — Support services for specialized High Performance Computing (HPC) systems used in solving complex computational problems through massive concurrent use of computing resources and parallel processing techniques.
Parent award / vehicle80ARC018D0010
Set-asideNot reported
Pricing typeCOST PLUS AWARD FEE
Obligations$10.0M
Current contract value$10.6M
Potential contract value / ceiling$10.6M
Start dateJul 1, 2024
Current end dateJun 30, 2025
Potential end dateJun 30, 2025
Latest award activityAug 29, 2025
Source loadedSep 26, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 7 of 7 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Aug 29, 2025P00006$0CORE TECHNICAL SERVICES TASK ORDER UNDER NASA ADVANCED COMPUTING SERVICES (NACS) CONTRACT.
May 12, 2025P00005$1.3MCORE TECHNICAL SERVICES TASK ORDER UNDER NASA ADVANCED COMPUTING SERVICES (NACS) CONTRACT.
Feb 14, 2025P00004$1.8MCORE TECHNICAL SERVICES TASK ORDER UNDER NASA ADVANCED COMPUTING SERVICES (NACS) CONTRACT.
Oct 22, 2024P00003$1.7MCORE TECHNICAL SERVICES TASK ORDER UNDER NASA ADVANCED COMPUTING SERVICES (NACS) CONTRACT.
Sep 11, 2024P00002$1.2MCORE TECHNICAL SERVICES TASK ORDER UNDER NASA ADVANCED COMPUTING SERVICES (NACS) CONTRACT
Jul 23, 2024P00001$2.0MCORE TECHNICAL SERVICES TASK ORDER UNDER NASA ADVANCED COMPUTING SERVICES (NACS) CONTRACT
May 9, 20240$2.0MCORE TECHNICAL SERVICES TASK ORDER UNDER NASA ADVANCED COMPUTING SERVICES (NACS) CONTRACT

Research next steps

  1. Confirm the ordering vehicle and your eligibility or a qualified teaming route.
  2. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.