Federal contract award

FA865125FB019

METHODOLOGY ASSESSMENT MISSION ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyDepartment of Defense
OfficeFA8651 AFRL RAZ
NAICS541715 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
PSCAC12 — NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - MILITARY; APPLIED RESEARCH
Parent award / vehicleFA865121D0021
Set-asideNot reported
Pricing typeCOST PLUS FIXED FEE
Obligations$2.0M
Current contract value$3.0M
Potential contract value / ceiling$3.0M
Start dateNov 22, 2024
Current end dateFeb 22, 2027
Potential end dateFeb 22, 2027
Latest award activityJun 3, 2026
Source loadedSep 26, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 10 of 10 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Jun 3, 2026P00009$200.0KMETHODOLOGY ASSESSMENT MISSION ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION
May 8, 2026P00008$250.0KMETHODOLOGY ASSESSMENT MISSION ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION
Apr 20, 2026P00007$294.2KMETHODOLOGY ASSESSMENT MISSION ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION
Jan 28, 2026P00006$100.0KMETHODOLOGY ASSESSMENT MISSION ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION
Dec 17, 2025P00005$231.0KAFRL/RW, MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS BRANCH (AFRL/RWSA) HAS THE MISSION TO CONDUCT APPLIED AND ADVANCED RESEARCH TO UNDERSTAND WEAPON EFFECTS BY EVALUATING THE LETHALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF WEAPONS VS DIFFERENT TARGET TYPES
Dec 3, 2025P00004$0AFRL/RW, MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS BRANCH (AFRL/RWSA) HAS THE MISSION TO CONDUCT APPLIED AND ADVANCED RESEARCH TO UNDERSTAND WEAPON EFFECTS BY EVALUATING THE LETHALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF WEAPONS VS DIFFERENT TARGET TYPES
Dec 2, 2025P00003$70.0KAFRL/RW, MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS BRANCH (AFRL/RWSA) HAS THE MISSION TO CONDUCT APPLIED AND ADVANCED RESEARCH TO UNDERSTAND WEAPON EFFECTS BY EVALUATING THE LETHALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF WEAPONS VS DIFFERENT TARGET TYPES
Apr 2, 2025P00002$125.0KAFRL/RW, MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS BRANCH (AFRL/RWSA) HAS THE MISSION TO CONDUCT APPLIED AND ADVANCED RESEARCH TO UNDERSTAND WEAPON EFFECTS BY EVALUATING THE LETHALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF WEAPONS VS DIFFERENT TARGET TYPES
Feb 11, 2025P00001$150.0KMODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS BRANCH HAS THE MISSION TO CONDUCT APPLIED AND ADVANCED RESEARCH TO UNDERSTAND WEAPON EFFECTS BY EVALUATING THE LETHALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF WEAPONS VS DIFFERENT TARGET TYPES
Nov 22, 20240$391.0KMETHODOLOGY ASSESSMENT MISSION ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION

Estimated positioning window

Oct 25, 2026 – Jan 23, 2027

Recompete signal:
75/100

Why this recompete signal

Contract timing and recorded acquisition signals at the time of calculation.

Stored score: 75/100. Available recorded signals: 70 points.

Contract end 2027-02-22 (120 days from calculation)
+35 points
219 historical awards in this buyer and category group
+15 points
10 recorded award transactions
+10 points
Latest award action: 2026-06-03
+5 points
Parent award identifier recorded
+5 points
Solicitation identifier recorded
+0 points
Linked official forecast
+0 points
Calculated on
2026-10-25 10:18:04.631876+00:00

The historical group combines buyer, NAICS, and PSC. Multiple awards in this group do not by themselves establish repeated competitions.

Rule-based research score; it does not measure your chance of winning.

This older calculation does not retain a complete reproducible breakdown. Missing or changed inputs are not assigned invented points: Original award-value bonus input.

USAspending award record

. Rule-based research score; positioning dates are estimates.

Recompete score calculated Oct 25, 2026.

Research next steps

  1. Check the linked forecast or SAM for a confirmed solicitation and current timing.
  2. Confirm the ordering vehicle and your eligibility or a qualified teaming route.
  3. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.