Federal contract award

FA875024CB041

BOOSTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY FOR PIPELINED REASONING OF VERIFIERS ENABLING ROBUST SYSTEMS (BETTER PROVERS)

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyDepartment of Defense
OfficeFA8750 AFRL RIK
NAICS541715 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
PSCAC11 — NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - MILITARY; BASIC RESEARCH
Parent award / vehicleNot reported
Set-asideNO SET ASIDE USED.
Pricing typeCOST PLUS FIXED FEE
Obligations$4.7M
Current contract value$6.5M
Potential contract value / ceiling$6.5M
Start dateMar 25, 2024
Current end dateNov 24, 2027
Potential end dateNov 24, 2027
Latest award activityMay 5, 2026
Source loadedSep 26, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 8 of 8 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
May 5, 2026P00007$600.0KBOOSTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY FOR PIPELINED REASONING OF VERIFIERS ENABLING ROBUST SYSTEMS (BETTER PROVERS)
Dec 15, 2025P00006$1.2MBOOSTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY FOR PIPELINED REASONING OF VERIFIERS ENABLING ROBUST SYSTEMS (BETTER PROVERS)
Aug 14, 2025P00005$380.0KBOOSTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY FOR PIPELINED REASONING OF VERIFIERS ENABLING ROBUST SYSTEMS (BETTER PROVERS)
Jul 8, 2025P00004$570.0KBOOSTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY FOR PIPELINED REASONING OF VERIFIERS ENABLING ROBUST SYSTEMS (BETTER PROVERS)
Apr 9, 2025P00003$0BOOSTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY FOR PIPELINED REASONING OF VERIFIERS ENABLING ROBUST SYSTEMS (BETTER PROVERS)
Mar 12, 2025P00002$429.7KBOOSTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY FOR PIPELINED REASONING OF VERIFIERS ENABLING ROBUST SYSTEMS (BETTER PROVERS)
Apr 19, 2024P00001$500.0KBOOSTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY FOR PIPELINED REASONING OF VERIFIERS ENABLING ROBUST SYSTEMS (BETTER PROVERS)
Mar 25, 20240$1.0MBOOSTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF RELIABILITY FOR PIPELINED REASONING OF VERIFIERS ENABLING ROBUST SYSTEMS (BETTER PROVERS)

Estimated positioning window

Nov 24, 2026 – May 24, 2027

Recompete signal:
70/100

Why this recompete signal

Contract timing and recorded acquisition signals at the time of calculation.

Stored score: 70/100. Available recorded signals: 65 points.

Contract end 2027-11-24 (388 days from calculation)
+25 points
13 historical awards in this buyer and category group
+15 points
8 recorded award transactions
+10 points
Latest award action: 2026-05-05
+5 points
Parent award identifier recorded
+0 points
Solicitation identifier recorded
+10 points
Linked official forecast
+0 points
Calculated on
2026-11-01 10:17:53.997580+00:00

The historical group combines buyer, NAICS, and PSC. Multiple awards in this group do not by themselves establish repeated competitions.

Rule-based research score; it does not measure your chance of winning.

This older calculation does not retain a complete reproducible breakdown. Missing or changed inputs are not assigned invented points: Original award-value bonus input.

USAspending award record

. Rule-based research score; positioning dates are estimates.

Recompete score calculated Nov 1, 2026.

Buyer contacts from matching notices

Matched on exact award/solicitation identifier and awarding agency. Source dates describe the notice, not current contact verification.

ContactRolePublished contact methodsEvidenceSource date
BAA CoordinatorContactPROVERS@darpa.milSourceMar 29, 2023

Research next steps

  1. Check the linked forecast or SAM for a confirmed solicitation and current timing.
  2. Check the stated set-aside against the solicitation and current certifications.
  3. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.