Federal contract award

FA875024CB069

TARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyDepartment of Defense
OfficeFA8750 AFRL RIK
NAICS541715 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
PSCAC12 — NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - MILITARY; APPLIED RESEARCH
Parent award / vehicleNot reported
Set-asideNO SET ASIDE USED.
Pricing typeCOST PLUS FIXED FEE
Obligations$1.1M
Current contract value$2.0M
Potential contract value / ceiling$2.0M
Start dateMay 7, 2024
Current end dateJul 7, 2028
Potential end dateJul 7, 2028
Latest award activityApr 2, 2026
Source loadedSep 19, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 11 of 11 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Apr 2, 2026P00011$261.0KTARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)
Mar 13, 2026P00010$44.0KTARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)
Feb 17, 2026P00009$68.0KTARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)
Jan 20, 2026P00008$24.0KTARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)
Dec 15, 2025P00007$24.0KTARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)
Sep 8, 2025P00006$125.0KDEVELOP THE TARGET RESOURCE ALLOCATION CAPABILITIES IN EXECUTION ROLE (TRACER) MULTI-OBJECTIVE ALL-DOMAIN PLANNING SERVICES TO SUPPORT AN OPEN MISSION SYSTEM (OMS)-COMPLIANT INTERFACE FOR COMMUNICATING WITH OTHER TECHNOLOGIES FOR EXPERIMENTATION.
Jun 16, 2025P00005$114.0KTARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)
Apr 29, 2025P00004$96.0KTARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)
Apr 1, 2025P00003$0TARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)
Jan 8, 2025P00002$0TARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)
Nov 5, 2024P00001$120.0KTARGETING EFFECTS REQUIRES MISSION INTEGRATION USING NOVEL APPLICATIONS AGAINST TARGETS FOR OPTIMIZED RESULTS (TERMINATOR)

Estimated positioning window

Jul 7, 2027 – Jan 7, 2028

Recompete signal:
70/100

Why this recompete signal

Contract timing and recorded acquisition signals at the time of calculation.

Stored score: 70/100. Available recorded signals: 65 points.

Contract end 2028-07-07 (621 days from calculation)
+25 points
187 historical awards in this buyer and category group
+15 points
11 recorded award transactions
+10 points
Latest award action: 2026-04-02
+5 points
Parent award identifier recorded
+0 points
Solicitation identifier recorded
+10 points
Linked official forecast
+0 points
Calculated on
2026-10-25 10:18:04.631876+00:00

The historical group combines buyer, NAICS, and PSC. Multiple awards in this group do not by themselves establish repeated competitions.

Rule-based research score; it does not measure your chance of winning.

This older calculation does not retain a complete reproducible breakdown. Missing or changed inputs are not assigned invented points: Original award-value bonus input.

USAspending award record

. Rule-based research score; positioning dates are estimates.

Recompete score calculated Oct 25, 2026.

Research next steps

  1. Check the linked forecast or SAM for a confirmed solicitation and current timing.
  2. Check the stated set-aside against the solicitation and current certifications.
  3. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.