Federal contract award

W911NF23C0032

R&D SERVICES, SUBCONTRACTOR & ODCS DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARMY-SPECIFIC WORK CONTEXTS AND SITUATIONS TAXONOMY

Research the contractorView USAspending sourceSave to my pursuit research

Award details

Obligations, current value and potential value describe different measures; they are never added together.

FieldReported value
AgencyDepartment of Defense
OfficeW6QK ACC-APG DURHAM
NAICS541715 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
PSCAJ12 — GENERAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY R&D SERVICES; GENERAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; APPLIED RESEARCH
Parent award / vehicleNot reported
Set-asideNO SET ASIDE USED.
Pricing typeCOST PLUS FIXED FEE
Obligations$812.2K
Current contract value$812.2K
Potential contract value / ceiling$812.2K
Start dateSep 1, 2023
Current end dateAug 31, 2027
Potential end dateAug 31, 2027
Latest award activityJun 3, 2026
Source loadedSep 26, 2026

Funding and modification history

Showing the latest 11 of 11 loaded transactions. Negative values are deobligations.

DateModificationObligation changeDescription
Jun 3, 2026P00008$0DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARMY-SPECIFIC WORK CONTEXTS AND SITUATIONS TAXONOMY
Apr 17, 2026P00007$0THE OVERALL OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE TAXONOMY OF WORK CONTEXTS, SITUATIONS, OR EVENTS WHICH ACCURATELY REFLECT VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE U.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENT (E.G., COMPLEX COMBINATIONS OF MOS/AOC, RANK, SPECIALIZATION).
Sep 15, 2025P00006$0THE OVERALL OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE TAXONOMY OF WORK CONTEXTS, SITUATIONS, OR EVENTS WHICH ACCURATELY REFLECT VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE U.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENT (E.G., COMPLEX COMBINATIONS OF MOS/AOC, RANK, SPECIALIZATION).
Jul 3, 2025P00005$0THE OVERALL OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE TAXONOMY OF WORK CONTEXTS, SITUATIONS, OR EVENTS WHICH ACCURATELY REFLECT VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE U.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENT (E.G., COMPLEX COMBINATIONS OF MOS/AOC, RANK, SPECIALIZATION).
Apr 22, 2025P00004$294.4KTHE OVERALL OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE TAXONOMY OF WORK CONTEXTS, SITUATIONS, OR EVENTS WHICH ACCURATELY REFLECT VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE U.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENT (E.G., COMPLEX COMBINATIONS OF MOS/AOC, RANK, SPECIALIZATION).
Jul 23, 2024P00003$0CONTRACTOR NAME CHANGE
Jul 22, 2024P00002$0GFP SHARING
May 22, 2024P00001$293.0KEXERCISE OPTION 1 AND NCE FOR BASE PERIOD.
Apr 16, 2024ARZ998$0R&D SERVICES, SUBCONTRACTOR & ODCS DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARMY-SPECIFIC WORK CONTEXTS AND SITUATIONS TAXONOMY
Feb 8, 2024ARZ999$0R&D SERVICES, SUBCONTRACTOR & ODCS DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARMY-SPECIFIC WORK CONTEXTS AND SITUATIONS TAXONOMY
Aug 9, 20230$224.8KR&D SERVICES, SUBCONTRACTOR & ODCS DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARMY-SPECIFIC WORK CONTEXTS AND SITUATIONS TAXONOMY

Estimated positioning window

Oct 25, 2026 – Feb 28, 2027

Recompete signal:
80/100

Why this recompete signal

Contract timing and recorded acquisition signals at the time of calculation.

Stored score: 80/100. Available recorded signals: 75 points.

Contract end 2027-08-31 (310 days from calculation)
+35 points
76 historical awards in this buyer and category group
+15 points
11 recorded award transactions
+10 points
Latest award action: 2026-06-03
+5 points
Parent award identifier recorded
+0 points
Solicitation identifier recorded
+10 points
Linked official forecast
+0 points
Calculated on
2026-10-25 10:18:04.631876+00:00

The historical group combines buyer, NAICS, and PSC. Multiple awards in this group do not by themselves establish repeated competitions.

Rule-based research score; it does not measure your chance of winning.

This older calculation does not retain a complete reproducible breakdown. Missing or changed inputs are not assigned invented points: Original award-value bonus input.

USAspending award record

. Rule-based research score; positioning dates are estimates.

Recompete score calculated Oct 25, 2026.

Research next steps

  1. Check the linked forecast or SAM for a confirmed solicitation and current timing.
  2. Check the stated set-aside against the solicitation and current certifications.
  3. Review the award scope and buyer evidence before making a bid/no-bid decision.